Sources

  1. Rebert Kerwin C. Billones, Carlos Matthew P. Cases, Tanya V. Olegario, Ryan Rhay P. Vicerra, Nilo T. Bugtai, Elmer P. Dadios, De La Salle University “A Systemic Evaluation of the Philippine Innovation Ecosystem” - 2020-12

Introduction

  • A prolific innovation ecosystem is the key to a successful innovation(s)
  • Oxentia’s The Elements of Review provides a systematic approach for evaluating innovation ecosystems; it can identify the gaps in the market.
  • It is good to have successful startups because it can integrate research-based technologies into enterprise-level systems
  • Innovation ecosystems are composed of elements which are classified into the following categories:
    1. Research (Universities)
    2. Government
    3. Businesses
    4. Third Sector (charities and enablers)

Research and Technology Organizations (RTOs)

  • Universities play a key role in innovation systems because they heavily contribute to research and development.
  • 6 elements included in this category
    1. vice-chancellor
    2. university policy
    3. research activity
    4. research services
    5. proof of concept funds
    6. technology transfer office

Technology transfer

Technology transfer pertains to the commercialization of university research

  • University researches are valuable sources for innovation. It can either be adopted by local communities or be commercialized.
  • Poor policy of technology transfer can drive off foreign subsidiaries from linking with a domestic firm
  • Philippines has good policies of technology transfer
    • Most universities support commercialization of their products
    • Existing laws involving the benefits of commercializing research products
    • Government and foreign organizations support Philippine researches
    • Technology Transfer Offices (TTOs) are present in the country’s big universities

Government

  • Governments can encourage the creation of startup by providing tax incentives, funding, and benefits for individuals forming innovative businesses. Philippine laws and organizations that tries to do this include the following:
    • Innovative Startup Act (RA 11337)
      • This mandates the creation of the Philippine Start-Up Development Program—a program that gives incentives and benefits for innovative businesses.
      • Provision of the Startup Grant Fund
        • This exempts startups from taxes in their first two years of operation
    • Tax Reform for Attracting Better and High Quality Opportunities (TRABAHO) Bill
      • Provide incentives for registered companies that pursue innovation
    • Innovation Council (or DOST-PCIEERD)
      • Provides grants for startups
  • Government challenges in promoting the creation of startups
    • No laws that incentivize early-age investors who invest from their own pockets

Businesses

  • Presence of businesses that closely work together in the country increases the chances of startups succeeding. This is because startups also need funds and connections to source materials and services.
  • Connecting startups with big companies can foster their growth: they have access to training, they are incubated until they are ready to be invested for, and they are provided venture capital.
  • Business networks also provide professional services that supplement the needs of an innovation system: they can allow startups to outsource some of their activities.

Third Sector

  • This includes the following elements:
    • Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)
    • charities
    • foundations
    • not-for-profit companies
    • social enterprises
  • These are organizations that supports and funds things (such as startups, innovations, and projects) that align with their goals.

Methodology

The Elements of Review prompts evaluators to rate the performance of each element in each categories of innovation ecosystems:

UniversitiesGovernmentBusinessesThe Third Sector
Vice-ChancellorTax IncentivesBusiness NetworksNon-governmental Organization
Research ActivityGrant ProgrammesInnovative Tech CompaniesCharity
University PolicyLegislative FrameworkBusiness AngelsFoundation
Research ServicesPublic ProcurementSeed and Venture CapitalNot for Profit
Proof of Concept FundsSupport, Clarity, and ConsistencyEntrepreneursSocial Enterprise
Tech Transfer OfficeProfessional Advisers

This paper used a number rating to assess each element (1 for low performance and 3 for best performance).

Results

SUMMARY

AreaRating
RTOs2.33
Government2.4
Businesses2.5
Third Sector1.4

RTOs

  • Although vice-chancellors support commercialization, not a lot of startups come from universities
  • University policies are unclear in the benefits they provide to research-entrepreneurs
  • Despite universities having transfer offices, they are not promoted enough.
ElementRating
Vice-chancellor2
Research activity3
University Policy1
Research Services3
Proof of Concept Funds3
Tech Transfer Office2

Government

  • Public procurement has the reputation of being slow
  • Support, clarity, and consistency, and the grant programmes still needs to be improved.
    • The need for a bill for angel investor incentives
    • Greater budget allocated for research
ElementRating
Tax Incentives3
Grant Programmes2
Legislative Framework3
Public Procurement2
Support, Clarity, and Consistency2

Business

  • Lack of companies engaging in high-tech industries
  • Need more emphasis on the design of devices or systems
  • Lack of domestic angel investors
  • Not many organizations provide venture capital
ElementRating
Business Networks3
Innovative Tech Companies2
Business Angels2
Seed and Venture Capital2
Entrepreneurs3
Professional Advisers3

Third Sector

  • Not a lot of third sector organizations active in this country
ElementRating
Non-Governmental Organizations1
Charity1
Foundation1
Not for Profit2
Social Enterprise2